If we believe in a literal millennial reign of Christ on this present earth then we would believe that this present earth is destroyed and remade only AFTER that, and then the New Jerusalem descends to the new earth. Jesus’ bodily coming to Jerusalem is certainly not the descent of the New Jerusalem.
Where’s the application to this? What would be the danger in not believing this? It could be alluded to in the fact that the majority of Christendom will take the mark and worship the beast in the belief that it is the loving ‘Christian’ thing to do, for the sake of world unity, to save the world, which is what Jesus wants, eh, to save the world? That the world live in peace and harmony? Spread the ‘love’ and the world can live as one?
And if the Church ‘authorities’ they respect, admire and submit to go along with it, then it must be OK?
And the conditioning for this to happen is contributed to and initiated by a spiritualizing of the Scriptures. If people mock and scoff now at the thought that the antichrist/beast is an actual man, they’re set up to receive a strong delusion, especially when the great signs and wonders start happening.
But i’m not trying to be pragmatic. My only grounds for believing anything, is that it is in fact true, and that alone; not on the benefits, ramifications or fallout of believing it, which would be pragmatic thinking. If you’re a pragmatist with Scripture, then you’re a hireling, and not an Ambassador of Christ.
If the hundreds of prophecies which relate to the Millennium are spiritualized into meaning that they refer to the Church age, now; that it is the reign and rule of Christianity over the earth now, then that is a wide open door to believe that the great apostasy happening now, and the ever increasing worldly political power of Christianity, is in fact the Kingdom of God coming in power, when it’s in fact the Kingdom of the devil.
From Catholicism to Rick and Rick, they all spiritualize the Millennial prophecies to legitimize their lust for worldly power and glory.