My comment on Organic Church Movements:
Objectivity is a central philosophical concept, related to reality and truth, which has been variously defined by sources. Generally, objectivity means the state or quality of being true even outside of a subject’s individual biases, interpretations, feelings, and imaginings. (Wikipedia)
We all naturally tend to be subjective in our thoughts, opinions, views and judgments, and as we walk with Jesus He teaches us to look at things objectively, perhaps for the first time in our lives. The goal is objectivity. The task is for naturally subjective thinkers to become more and more objective in their thinking.
Subjectivity is very close to pragmatism: if it works for me, if it’s good for me, it must be right.
“If it makes you happy, it can’t be that bad…” (Sheryl Crow)
Subjectivity can be very selective, according to what we want, rather than what is true.
In house churches there are usually two basic dynamics: sharing subjective experience, challenges, problems, feelings, viewpoints, opinions – sharing the highs and lows of life, AND objectively proclaiming the truth of God’s Word, either by prophesying, or by teaching. These two dynamics need to be in balance and harmony with one another. Yes, how we feel is important, we are not to become insensitive to how people feel and whatever challenges and difficulties they are going thru, and yet if this dynamic selectively replaces and excludes the objective teaching and proclaiming of the truth of God’s Word then there is no substance to the church, and it will be blown around by the winds of doctrine which sweep thru, and is at the “mercy” of savage wolves, who seek such spiritual vacuums in order to get control. The current trend is that subjective experience dominates, and objective teaching is becoming extinct, and this is a process of developing apostasy.
The subjective thinking Christian relates to the Bible in terms of how they feel about it, whether it will be good for them, and truth is determined in terms of “what’s in it for me?”. But the objective thinking Christian is willing to embrace what is true even if it hurts, even if it is the painful reality he must face. Objective people are firstly concerned whether something is true or not before they are concerned whether it benefits them, but the subjective thinker can easily be deceived by the sinfulness of their own heart: thinking things to be true bcos THEY NEED THEM TO BE TRUE.
Another characteristic of the objective Christian is they are aware of what God wants to do and what God wants to speak to people, in addition to what God is speaking to them personally. But the subjective Christian assumes that the things which God is personally addressing with them are the things they need to preach and teach others: their teaching is more self-referring than objective.
Luke 24:45 “Then he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures.”
He opened their minds, He did not bypass their minds. They had to engage their minds and not disengage. The word of God renews our minds, and by the Spirit we learn to think in an orderly and objective manner.
Gets right to the heart of the matter. Apostles such as Paul don’t fit into the intellectual/theological paradigm, and nor do they fit into the experience-junkie mold : there is a perfect harmony between experience and intellect so that they did not trust in their intellect or in spiritual experiences.
It would be very hard to pigeonhole Paul into any of the current paradigms of Christianity.
The true Holy Spirit brings a perfect harmony between our spirit, our soul (intellect and emotions) and our body.